The patrician, well-dressed manner of many top lawyers and accountants often belies the dirty work they do. The leak of more than 11 million documents from Panamanian law firm firm Mossack Fonseca reveals the staggering extent to which professional lawyers and accountants will collude with their clients, many of them sanctioned or with blood on their hands, to help them avoid and evade tax.
Give me Rumpole of the Bailey, John Mortimer’s fictional Old Bailey Hack, anyday, in preference to the suave cohorts of clever, unscrupulous, criminal accountants and lawyers. Dishevelled, but principled, Rumpole’s work barely kept him in claret and cheroots.
The leaked documents show that Mossack Fonseca conspired to conceal the true beneficial owners of companies, enabled criminals to conceal the source of their wealth, and assisted prime ministers, presidents and dictators, their families and friends, to benefit from dodgy business transactions that take money from the pockets of their own people.
And yet Mossack Fonseca, with breath-taking chutzpah, have claimed that their operations over the last forty years have been entirely ‘beyond reproach’.
HSBC Private Banking did it. The big accounting firms do it. They all do it. If you have a little more money than most people you’ll attract swarms of professional advisers offering you ways of keeping your money from the taxman. I know. And as long as detection is unlikely, and as long as the cost of such advice is lower than the tax that you’d otherwise pay, these suave cohorts will go on doing it.
It’s time to end the tax evasion game. How?
- Make tax reasonable
- Harmonise taxes where possible
- Abolish tax havens
- Abolish anonymous ownership
- Publish beneficial ownership on the internet
- Apply sanctions when the rules are broken
And yes, it would effectively deny a country the sovereign right to set its own rules on tax, disclosure and incorporation. But ours is a connected world. A country is welcome to go its own way if it chooses, but in economic and political isolation.
Tax is a zero-sum game. What the rich man retains, the poor man loses. Tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance are immoral and should be both illegal and very difficult.
I am optimistic. These revelations are the start of the end of tax evasion. It’s interesting that so far there’s been nothing about how these 11 million documents have been obtained. Who was the leaker or the hacker? Was it an insider? Or might there have been state involvement?
I agree with all you say, but…. yes there is always a but…For as long as government agencies behave recklessly with their tax receivables, the moral imperative is questionable.
Many governments are very happy to spend money on their pet political projects. Some are good. Some are bad and some are just as criminal as the tax evader’s agenda.
I am not talking here about rogue third world nations either. The last time the auditors for the European Union bureaucracy were able to close this grotesque institution’s books was – never.
Billions are squandered every year. Much goes in graft and the kind of waste of having to move the entire organisation to Strasbourg even month to appease French vanity.
And now we learn that the UK sends €27 million of tax payers money to certain organisations outside of Europe that they know full well funds certain terrorist gangs which is illegal.
This is not meant as a BREXIT rant, by the way, but a rounding of the argument you made.
Business revenues must be fully transparent and fair taxes paid but government must be transparent too.
The contract between government and tax payer must be equal on both sides and accountability applicable to both sides.
Stephen, Yes, I agree with you. Taxes must be reasonably spent as efficiently as possible on the agenda for which the government was elected, and with an obligation not to borrow too much from future generations (not yet members of their electorate). Sadly, when bureaucracies waste too much, and tax evaders feel they are justified in their evasion, the burden falls disproportionately on those who have less to squirrel away.
Well I think the makeshift banner I just saw on CNN sums up both our positions.
The wording was : “Down With This Sort of Thing”
And who can possibly argue with that?